The Japanese Line Method as a Tool for Multiplication Mastery: A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Philippine Elementary Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64807/6j5jrr26Abstract
This mixed-methods quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of the Japanese Line Method (JLM) for multiplication in enhancing the mathematical skills of Grade 3 elementary pupils, emphasizing hands-on learning experiences and visual strategies. A total of 22 Grade 3 pupils from Kamelon Elementary School participated. To evaluate the method’s effectiveness, the researchers conducted pretests and posttests and analyzed the scores using statistical tools, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess differences. In addition to the quantitative data, the study employed a thematic approach to analyze pupils’ reflections and experiences after the intervention, providing deeper insights into their engagement and perceptions of JLM. The findings showed significant improvements in the multiplication skills of the pupils who used JLM, indicating its effectiveness as a teaching strategy. This study emphasizes the advantages of using JLM in mathematics education and suggests it can be a valuable tool for enhancing students' multiplication skills and improving their overall mathematical learning experience, particularly in the context of the Department of Education’s learning competencies. Moreover, the positive results highlight the importance of integrating visual and tactile methods in teaching mathematics to cater to diverse learning styles. Teachers are encouraged to integrate JLM into regular mathematics instruction to support learners who benefit from visual and hands-on strategies. Schools may also consider providing training and workshops to help educators implement this method effectively and further enhance pupils’ understanding of multiplication.
Keywords:
Japanese Line Method, Multiplying of Quantities, Multiplication skillsReferences
Abari, M.T., & Tyovenda. (2022). The Effect of Japanese Multiplication on Students’Achievement and Retention in Mathematics. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359438163
Aktay, S., & Yılmaz, F. (2025). Teaching Multiplication through the Japanese Multiplication Method: An Action Research study. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen Ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 19(1), 142–185. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1537070
Alabi, M. (2024). Visual Learning: The power of Visual Aids and Multimedia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385662029
Aliyu, B. (2022). Impact of Japanese Multiplication Technique on Academic Performance among Primary Five Pupils in Tureta, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7050805
Alomiear, S., AlKhamash, A., & Aljadhai, A. (2024). The impact of cognitive activation practices on enhancing student mathematical reasoning in mathematical literacy: A causal comparative study based on PISA 2022. International Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 7(4), 228–257. https://search.shamaa.org/PDF/Articles/FC/ERIjres/IjresVol7No4Y2024/ijres_2024-v7-n4_228-257_eng.pdf
Azzizah, F. N., Amaliyah, A., Amalia, R., & Muflihah, Z. (2022). Analysis of Multiplication Learning Difficulties in Students. Review of Multidisciplinary Education, Culture and Pedagogy, 1(3), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.55047/romeo.v1i3.220
Chinn, S. (2020). The trouble with maths: A practical guide to helping learners with numeracy difficulties. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017714
Dumagat, C. R., Dones, N. C., & Susada, B. L. (2024). Integrating Japanese Line Method: A Tool for Multiplication in Third Grade in the Context of Philippine Curriculum. Davao Research Journal, 15(4), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v15i4.271
Flores, M. M., and Hinton, V. M. (2019). Improvement in elementary student’s multiplication skills and understanding after learning through the combination of the concrete-representational-abstract sequence and strategic instruction. Education and treatment of children, 42(1), 73-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0004
Garain, D., & Kumar, S. (2018). Japanese vs Vedic Methods for Multiplication. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 54(3), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/ijmtt-v54p525
Jamaludin, N. H., & Maat, S. M. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review on Students Misconceptions in Mathematics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 127–145
Kareem, A., Abari, & Tyovenda. (2022). The Effect of Japanese Multiplication on Pupils' Interest in Mathematics. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360320473
Lasmawan, I. W., & Budiarta, I. W. (2020). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and the Students’ Progress in Learning (A Heutagogical Bibliographical Review). JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(4), 545. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.29915
Merrotsy, P. (2023). Zetetics and the Art of Mathematical Enquiry. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN-9781443857222, 144385722X
Mills, J. P. (2019). Making multiplication meaningful: Teaching for conceptual understanding. Teachers and Curriculum, 19(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v19i1.334
Nuritasari, T., Tafrilyanto, A., Aini, & Hasanah Surahmi. (2024). Mathematics Learning Using Japanese Multiplication Method (JAMED) Solving Multiple Problems Class III Basic Education Students. Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v6i2
Sunzuma, G., & Luneta, K. (2023). Zimbabwean Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers’ Implementation of the Learner-Centered Curriculum During Teaching Practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2258. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13131
Thangaraj, V., & Chin, H. (2024). Effectiveness of Japanese Multiplication Method on Improving Grade Two Malaysian Students’ Multiplication Computation Fluency. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i3/22652
Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135
Villarin, S. J. B., Lapinig, G. C., Divino, D. G. C., Lumahang, K. P., & Echavez, L. F. J. (2025). Crafting a Responsive Teaching Framework for Data Analysis: a phenomenological study on students’ experiences in learning descriptive and inferential statistics. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 3(3), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v3i3.5483
Zhang, D., Ding, Y., Lee, S., & Chen, J. (2016). Strategic development of multiplication problem solving: Patterns of students’ strategy choices. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1060928
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rocelyn Legaspi, Kimberly Cayano, Reynald Maliao, Jeffry Jerome Beñola, Ma. Mikaela Gador, Sydney Jay Villarin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in QCU Journals are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows for:
- Sharing – copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting – remixing, transforming, and building upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
