Evaluation Of Student Support Services as A Basis for Quality Improvement in A University Setting: Case of Quezon City University

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64807/997mxb34

Abstract

Student satisfaction has become an important tool for assessing the quality of services and support provided by higher education institutions in the changing educational environment. Abstract This study examines the student satisfaction on services at Quezon City University (QCU) using inputs of four administrative offices such as Admissions & Registrar, Finance & Scholarship, Guidance & Counseling and Office of Student Affairs (OSA). By employing a comprehensive student satisfaction survey, the research uncovers the elements impacting satisfaction, pinpoints areas for actionable improvement, and recommends strategic interventions to enhance service quality. The methodology uses a mixed methods approach, integrating quantitative measures (e.g., weighted mean calculations, Net Promoter Scores, or NPS) with qualitative feedback. Data were collected from students across different academic years, which facilitates comparative analysis that may be able to identify patterns of temporal changes in satisfaction. Analysis outlines strengths and challenges to service delivery Students did say they appreciated current initiatives, but also identified responsiveness, communication and staff approachability as areas for growth. Data-driven student centered approaches, timely proactive communication followed by continuous feedback mechanisms implementation is essential. These involve ensuring people and services are more accessible digitally, that processes are not overly bureaucratic and that staff are trained in student engagement. Addressing these insights empowers QCU to better meet the diverse needs of its students, create a nurturing academic environment, and enhance its overall commitment to excellence. This research underscores the power of data-driven strategies to revolutionize the student experience, creating a more responsive and enriching experience at the university.

Keywords:

student satisfaction; higher education; institutional support; quality improvement; student support services; Quezon City University, student satisfaction, higher education, institutional support, quality improvment, student support services, Quezon City University

References

Ali, M., Amir, H., & Ahmed, M. (2021). The role of university switching costs, perceived service quality, perceived university image and student satisfaction in shaping student loyalty. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(1), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.1975184

Alhamad, N. A. M., Elnahaiesi, N. M. F. B., & Baadhem, N. A. M. S. (2024). The effect of perceived quality, student life social identification on student satisfaction with moderator role of organizational identification. International Research Journal of Applied Engineering and Economics, 2(4), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0149

Baldwin, G., & Johnson, A. (2019). The role of student feedback in service improvement: A case study of student satisfaction surveys in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1537750

Bueno, D. C. (n.d.). Enhancing graduate school experience: A comprehensive evaluation of student satisfaction with services and facilities. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED630176

Chandra, T., Hafni, L., Chandra, S., Purwati, A. A., & Chandra, J. (2019). The influence of service quality, university image on student satisfaction and student loyalty. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(5), 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2018-0212

Gunduz, M., Naji, K. K., & Maki, O. (2023). Evaluating the performance of campus facility management through structural equation modeling based on key performance indicators. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5641

Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh, F. B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188

Hoyt, J. E. (2021). Student connections: The critical role of student affairs and academic support services in retention efforts. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 25(3), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025121991502

Kok, H. B., Mobach, M. P., & Omta, O. S. (2011). The added value of facility management in the educational environment. Journal of Facilities Management, 9(4), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961111170662

Morron, M. (2023, June 21). The importance of embracing diversity in the classroom. LiNC. https://blog.linclearning.com/the-importance-of-embracing-diversity-in-the-classroom

Mulyono, H., Hadian, A., Purba, N., & Pramono, R. (2020). Effect of service quality toward student satisfaction and loyalty in higher education. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 929–938. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.929

Saputra, G. W., Kurniawati, K., Sulistyan, R. B., & Bhawna, B. (2023). Maintaining service quality: The important role of operator performance in educational institutions. Innovation Business Management and Accounting Journal, 2(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.56070/ibmaj.v2i1.31

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Dela Cruz, M., Cueva, A. R., Jungco, R., & Mostajo, S. (2024). Evaluation Of Student Support Services as A Basis for Quality Improvement in A University Setting: Case of Quezon City University. QCU The Lamp, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.64807/997mxb34